Industry · EPC & Heavy Construction
Vendor documents, shop drawings and submittals arrive by the thousand. standrdX checks each one against the project specification and the owner standard before it moves downstream.
The segment
An EPC project runs on documents produced by other people. Vendor data, shop drawings, submittals and supplier datasheets arrive continuously, each one requiring a check against a specification written months earlier.
The reviewers are not slow. There are simply more submittals than hours, so depth is rationed by whatever the programme will allow that week.
Vendor and contractor deliverable → owner standard.
Everything an EPC signs for was produced by somebody who does not answer to the owner standard.
Where it breaks
A deliverable is re-read at every issue against a layered set of owner standards, project specifications and the addenda that override them.
Issued for review, and the queue builds
Issued for approval, where addendum overrides get missed
Issued for construction, and procurement follows
Handover, where findings must be defensible
← CAUGHT AT REVIEW · A CORRECTIONCAUGHT ON SITE · CONSTRUCTION REWORK COSTS →
Where teams start
Most EPC teams start with the submittal type that arrives most often.
Supplier sheets against the project specification.
EXPLORE →P&IDs, isometrics and layouts, object by object.
EXPLORE →What each contractor offered against the enquiry.
EXPLORE →Review coverage across the project.
EXPLORE →Whether the submittal and the drawing agree.
EXPLORE →What a revised owner standard puts back in question.
EXPLORE →Alongside your stack
Submittals leave your document control platform the way they always have. standrdX reads what comes out and returns a register your transmittal process already accepts.
FAQ
It checks vendor documents, shop drawings and submittals against the project specification and the owner standard, and raises each deviation against the clause that was not met.
The vendor data requirement is a requirement like any other. Load the specification that sets it and each submittal is checked against it, rather than against a reviewer's recollection of it.
No. Those systems route submittals and hold the record of issue. standrdX reads the engineering content and returns findings into that same flow.
Applicability is recorded per standard, so a piping submittal is not checked against a clause written for instrumentation.
The locating and evidence-gathering is done before a reviewer opens the submittal, which is the part of a review that consumes the hours without needing judgement.
Yes. Every finding carries the clause and evidence, and the register exports for transmittal.
Next step
Load the project specification and a vendor submittal, and compare what standrdX raises against what your own review found.